THE SLIME HIGHWAY…
There is nothing “honorable” about the current debacle taking place in “Judge” Sherry Stephen’s courtroom. Rumor has it that her term is over in 2016 and she doesn’t care about her job. Other’s say she comes up for re-election in 2015, either way, if there is any sense of justice and honor left in the world, this outrage will insure that Stephens never handles a case of this magnitude again. She is completely out of her league and yes I will say it: She is deliberately helping the defense to disrupt this sentencing phase.
But then we all know that there is and never has been anything that even distantly resembles “justice” in Arizona, for Travis Alexander. The killer has continued to kill Travis for 7 years now, with the help of Judge Sherry Stephens.
From the moment Travis Alexander had the terrible misfortune to meet Jodi Arias, his destiny was sealed. It didn’t take him long to figure out that there was something terribly wrong with her.
Travis was stalked, tormented, harassed, bullied and then finally butchered in his own home by a woman who knew she wasn’t good enough for him.
How many people have encountered someone who seems like a nice person in the beginning, but soon you begin to realize that something’s not adding up? How many of us have gone on that first date or even said “hi” to a neighbor, and discovered that the “nice neighbor” was not so nice, and now you had to figure out how to sever the ties? How many have met a charming person, but then later found out that they were dealing with a predator or a psycho?
I would submit to you that each and every one of us has met someone who is not what they appear to be. Someone we have later discovered is nothing but a liar and a fraud, exactly as Travis did.
Travis didn’t want Jodi Arias anymore. He discovered what she really was, and said: “No thanks. See you later.”
And who wouldn’t?
Take Jodi Arias’s “art,” for instance.
It’s a lie, just like everything else about her. She doesn’t draw, she traces. That’s not art. That’s what children do in kindergarten class.
Travis found out that Jodi Arias was a FRUAD and wanted to get as far away from her as he possibly could.
Travis couldn’t stand to be around Jodi Arias anymore.
So Jodi Arias killed him, and she continues to do so at every opportunity to this day!
It is as plain as the nose on your face that this defendant has no mitigators. None. What the defense has done now is create yet more aggravators.
You see, Jodi Arias, convicted stalker and killer, has been given a chance to tell the lie of her life. Unlike other defendants we have seen in action, this defendant is a good liar. However Arias is so unredeemable, so beyond any salvation, so evil, that she has thrown that chance away in favor of further destroying Travis Alexander’s reputation. Jodi Arias refuses to show remorse, even if it means saving her own life.
She’s that evil.
Instead of saying the simplest and most straightforward thing:
“I’m so sorry. I must have lost my mind. I don’t know what happened. I loved him too much. I am a GOOD person. Please don’t kill me.”
This cold blooded monster has chosen to murder Travis Alexander all over again, for yet a third time and the judge is allowing it. This murderer can’t stop killing Travis Alexander. She is not fit for society.
You need but one brain cell to decide this monster’s fate, because the crime has already been deemed heinous and cruel and she has already been found guilty of it. This trial would have been over years ago if Jodi Arias had been a man.
Sexism is running rampant in Stephen’s courtroom and she has given the defendant the keys to the court house. Stephens sits like a lump on a log, while the defendant and her minions turn the courtroom into a side show and use the system as an instrument of torture, against the victim’s family. This has not been a trial. It has been a campaign of sleaze and hate, aimed towards both the victim and the prosecutor, and the judge has allowed all of it.
With the exception of Judge Belvin Perry, in over 20 years of trial watching, I have never seen a judge collude with a defense team to help a killer escape justice. Both judges allowing novice defense attorneys to take over the system and their courtrooms amount to a cry for change.
This entire sentencing fiasco has been a blatant attempt, by the defense, to retry the criminal case, waste time and spread as much slime all over Travis Alexander’s memory as they can. They are no doubt hoping that the jurors will drop out one by one, and the sentencing will be done by the killer’s best friend, Sherry Stephens.
In spite of their attempts to blame the prosecutor for the so called “slime-highway” that they themselves have created, Kurt Nurmi and Jennifer Willmott failed. They are still two of the most pathetic excuses for defense attorneys that I have ever seen.
We all still have our eyes and ears. Most of us saw this same “technique” used in the criminal trial and from the beginning it’s been a slime highway paved by the defense and paid for by the taxpayers. We all remember. We have seen Jodi Arias’s naked vagina, anus and clitoris, spread wide, red and raw, projected onto the courthouse walls, in all of it’s weather-worn glory, as Kurt Nurmi drones on for hours over pop rocks and anal sex. We have heard the killer’s voice, filling the courtroom and egging Travis Alexander on, waking him up in the middle of the night to engage him in dirty phone conversations, so she can record them, and later blackmail him.
It’s really rather hard to forget and it isn’t brain surgery, although Nurmi and Willmott would like for you to believe it is.
Lawyering 101, I would think, goes a little like this…
Rule #1: Never expect the jury to get a sudden case of unexplained amnesia.
This defense team has done everything and anything they can to stop the process and jam the system up with utter nonsense, and none of it would be possible without the cooperation of this so called “judge.” The judge is supposed to be the one who controls the courtroom, but so far she has done absolutely nothing to that end. The result is a mockery of justice. It is a sad play, directed by a devious killer, who has found a judge she can manipulate exactly as she did Travis Alexander!
Much like their client, Nurmi and Willmott seem to have no moral compass what so ever. Sinking lower than the lowest layer of prehistoric frog shit on the planet, Nurmi and Willmott have desperately tried to point the finger at the prosecutor for being the slim-meister in this trial, when we all remember full well where the slime came from.
Arias was lucky enough to get two defense attorneys who just happened to slither out from under the same slimy rock that she did. It’s a small world isn’t it?
The “I’m rubber and your’e glue and everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you”-defense, came off like a group of angry fat kids on the playground. Comical relief, if it didn’t all revolve around the near decapitation of an innocent human being. Nurmi and Willmott’s only skill so far, has been to show their gills and demonstrate to the world just how deep into the frog shit they are willing to go. The word repulsive comes to mind.
Our founding fathers are clawing at their graves right now, trying to get out and put a stop to this joke of a trial. This is not at all what they intended when they crafted the constitution. This trial has stomped all over the rights of both Travis Alexander and an enraged public, who want to see justice for the victim in this case. The longer the system tortures the Alexander family, the longer the system continues the trashing of the victim’s memory, the worse the fall-out is going to be.
Something needs to change and it needs to change now.
So did the defense manage to pay off one of these jurors? They have certainly proven to the world that they are “slimy” enough.
Is there a stealth juror on this jury with an anti-death penalty agenda? Or is the defense just going to try to draw this thing out as long as they can, in the hopes that they lose enough jurors to cause a mistrial? That way dis-honorable “Judge” Stephens can jump in there, usurp the system and give this monster life, or horrors of all horrors life with the possibility of parole?
This case screams for the death penalty.
If Jodi Arias was a MAN…this would have been over years ago and HE would already be sitting on death row. There is no doubt who committed this crime and it is not the job of this jury to decide guilt or innocence. She is guilty.
So do we now allow women to stalk and butcher human beings for the simple act of breaking up, but hold men to a much stricter standard?
As a taxpaying member of society I say hell no.
Not one thing the defense has presented has changed my opinion, quite the opposite. They have hi-lighted the cold nature of this defendant and shown that without a doubt, she will destroy lives and kill again. But then we don’t have to guess at that do we? We have the defendant’s own words to reference. The defense in this case has, in fact, given the jury yet more reasons to impose the death penalty on this convicted killer.
The same can be said for virtually every witness who has testified for the defense, both in the criminal trial and now in what is supposed to be the sentencing phase.
This defendant has shown NO remorse.
She is vicious and she is devious.
She planned this crime meticulously.
She stalked him.
She cornered him.
She shot him.
She stabbed him.
She covered up her crime.
And after all of the above, she was found GUILTY of murder in the first degree with heinous and cruel circumstances.
This creature does not deserve to take another breath, much less be given the opportunity to destroy the only thing that Travis Alexander has left, his reputation. It is an outrage that Travis, who worked hard to improve his life and be a good person, now suffers the slander of his killer, and has no way to defend himself.
The judge has made sure that the killer has been protected and in the process has thrown the victim and his family to the wolves.
It is an outrage.
None. There has not been one mitigator presented. “Trash Travis” is all they can come up with, and the witnesses themselves, expose the defense as desperate and pathetic.
HACKS AND QUACKS…
In a failing effort to try and make it appear that the prosecutor tampered with Travis Alexander’s computer, when Jodi Arias herself was the one who had been left alone with it, the defense team takes another stab at dirtying up prosecutor Juan Martinez with witness Bryan Nuemiester, who claims to be a computer “expert.” From what I can see on his resume, there is not one word about “computers,” however it is clear from that same resume that he is an out of work helicopter news pilot, who might know a little something about audio-video equipment. The witness came off as an arrogant and angry child, who had a score to settle with the prosecutor. When he was through testifying, he approached the killer and had no problem shaking the hand that she murdered Travis Alexander with. I’m assuming it was another childish attempt to dirty the mean old prosecutor, but in effect Mr. Helicopter showed his juvenile side, along with his considerable ass, to a weary and disgusted public.
Twitter and social media responded:
Taking every opportunity he could to call the prosecutor slimy, he giggled at himself and how clever he thought he was, had temper tantrums, and like a kid you once knew in elementary school, could not stop saying the word “slimy.”
I wondered if he still lived with his mother.
We all know where the slime came from and I don’t need someone who forgot to puff up their resume (to match their bullshit,) in order to remember…but thanks.
It has always come directly from the defense and this witness continued the tradition.
Which brings up an interesting point. Has Kurt Nurmi had a magnificent “revelation?”
Has Nurmi, the defender of pedophiles and their freedom to molest little children, now decided that pedophiles deserve being hacked to death? Nurmi wants this jury to believe that Travis Alexander “had it coming” because the Butcher caught him “looking at a photo?” Has Kurt Nurmi done a 360? Has he now decided that it’s OK to kill pedophiles and hack them to pieces if you happen to catch them looking at a picture of a child?
Of course everyone knows that Travis Alexander was NO PEDOPHILE.
Just like everyone knows that Kurt Nurmi is not to be trusted or believed.
It is the biggest lie of this entire trial and the biggest disgrace.
It is a lie told by a convicted killer to further demean her victim and it’s disgraceful that the court has allowed it with not one shred of proof.
There’s your slime highway.
Travis’s big crime was rejecting Jodi Arias and wanting her out of his life.
You don’t break up with Jodi Arias or she will kill you. You don’t do anything Jodi Arias doesn’t want, by her own words, or she will kill you.
More blatant lies from defense witness “Dr.” Miccio Fonseca, who was allowed to opine endlessly as to what Travis Alexander was thinking, feeling, doing, even going so far as to calling the victim, whom she had never even so much as spoken a word to, a “master manipulator!”
Fonseca took the jury down the rabbit hole to a world of her own design, where up was down and down was up. In Fonseca’s upside-down-world, clearly Travis was a demon from hell and Jodi was an innocent victim.
Even though the convicted murderer escaped without so much as a scratch, and Travis Alexander was shot and butchered like meat and oh yeah, once again, she’s already been convicted of first degree murder.
Outrageous and galling for the victim’s family to have to listen to this hocus-pocus (more like unadulterated bullshit) being spewed around the courtroom as if it was fact, and worse, by this pre-historic quack!
Since Jodi Arias has already been convicted of first degree murder and everything Fonseca is saying has been REJECTED by the first jury…this hashtag Liar4Hire is a little late to the dance.
Fonseca, who was roundly referred to as “Dr. Quack” on every social media site, and slammed unmercifully by trial watchers, was able to spin the victim into a monster during a hearing that is only supposed to demonstrate to the jury why the defendant should live.
This should have been stopped by the judge, who, as usual, sat there like the proverbial lump on a log and just simply breathed and collected dust. As Fonseca pretended to know exactly what Travis Alexander was thinking and feeling, she rambled on endlessly dumping buckets of hearsay on the courtroom floor. At the same time, the twitter world pounded her with insults, criticisms and nicknames.
There’s nobody flying the plane folks!
Fonseca has been in trouble for fabricating testimony before, and was taken to task for it in 2008.
No surprise there.
I would say Fonseca flat out LIED on the stand. She did everything in her power to bend reality and twist the facts in the defendants favor. Why didn’t Judge Stephens just allow Fonseca to bust out her turban and her crystal ball, and hold a seance on the witness stand?
You would have thought Fonseca was speaking to Travis from the grave.
This could only happen in a system that desperately needs changing.
Fonseca’s only goal was to make it appear that Travis Alexander deserved to be butchered like meat. It was a joke.
Nothing this quack said should ever be admitted in any trial. Not only did she try to “talk to the dead” on the stand and convince the jury that she had some sort of unearthly power to enter Travis Alexander’s mind postmortem, but she came off as yet another childish witness, who couldn’t control herself and loved to use the word slime.
A fabricator, who wanted the jury to believe that Travis Alexander “had it coming.”
Her performance did nothing to help the defense and everything to prove how devious this killer really is.
No surprise it was a major fail and hopefully the end of Fonseca’s career as a paid witness.
It was revolting to watch.
Clearly, it’s the defense team who has taken America down the mother of all sludge tunnels, in what can only be described as a national embarrassment.
Clearly it was Fonseca herself, who was the one willing to go down the “Sleaze Highway” at any opportunity when questioned by the defense.
Jodi Arias has been found guilty of murdering Travis Alexander in cold blood, with heinous and cruel circumstances. The trial is over.
So why are Arizona taxpayers and the victims of this heinous crime being further tortured by this defense with assistance from Sherry Stephens? Why is Sherry Stephens allowing the defense team to re-try the criminal case, when the criminal case has already been decided and we are now in the penalty phase? Why is the judge allowing witnesses to refuse to answer questions posed by prosecutor Juan Martinez? Why is she allowing people to “imagine” what Travis Alexander was thinking and feeling, and tarnish his image with allegations that are coming from a stalker, a killer and a pathological liar?
Sherry Stephens has consistently helped the defendant re-victimize Travis Alexander, soil his reputation and torment the family.
Even after his brutal murder (of which she has already been found guilty) this defendant continues to be given unlimited opportunities to destroy the victim’s reputation and wreck havoc on the family.
This is not justice. This is an expensive joke and a slap in the face, to every citizen living in Arizona along with taxpayers everywhere.
Every single person who is forced to be around this killer in the future is in danger. That is by her own words, in a television interview that she held. It was an interview that should have come into evidence at this sentencing phase, but true to form, the judge is keeping the killer’s threats from this jury.
This convicted killer is, and always will be, a dangerous threat to everyone around her.
If there ever was a shadow of a doubt about it, this trial has eliminated it.
Since most of us are not dangerous stalkers, and we don’t plot the murder and decapitation of someone we claim to love, most of us live in fear of encountering someone like Jodi Arias.
Is this how the system would treat one of us or one of our family members, should we have the misfortune of meeting someone just like this remorseless killer?
Since most of us, besides paying taxes, live in fear of people like Jodi Arias, we are looking at this trial and asking:
Where is the justice for the victim?
Where is the justice forTravis?